Scar Night - a Review

Scar Night is the first book of the Codex and a well thought out introductory novel. As this is quite possibly high fantasy, it focuses on that which is important in an introductory novel whilst setting up the story (from one perspective only) for the book and, later, Iron Angel and God of Clocks. My one gripe with the plot is that of Mr Nettle, I found his segments relatively boring compared to that of the other facets which managed to add in a variety of different ideas based around a city suspended by chains. Whilst Mr Nettle played a certain part in the plot, and even helps the ending along quite nicely, I feel it quite possible that the story could be reworked around him.

This is also a good thing, as it highlights what I found to be a pleasingly multifaceted plot. In my experience, many first novels in a trilogy have a tendency to be too focused, so that when the proverbial all seeing eye is dragged back in the following books, it can sometimes seem a jarring exercise. The main plot and that of the little ‘subplots’, if they can so be called, are borne of the individual characters. Nearly all characters introduced, apart from a few for which this would seem foolish, perhaps, can be what one describes as a ‘main character’. Yet, whilst this may sound messy, the result is not so. If I were to give a critique behind all the characters here, I would still be here in spring. Therefore, I shall constrain myself to a few points which I felt well done and, perhaps not so well done.

Dill appears to be a completely different character from what I would expect, and this is pleasing. As the last of Ulcis’ archons (read: angel) he is neither arrogant or boastful, but so sheltered his wings have had little time to dry. Whilst, at some points in the book this can get a little annoying when he particularly whines, most of the time it is well balanced. The fact that he is the last archon allows for the presbyter to play his piece, and does so well, as one is never entirely sure, like his colleagues, how much he is obfuscating. Although, perhaps it would be better to discover this revelation on our own instead of being told it explicitly via an underling. During the time in this book, Rachel’s character, was quite disappointing, but one can only presume her development is being saved. Unlike, Carnival’s, who’s character was quite interesting, and mad - to say the very least.

Ulcis’ city of chains, that is the titular Deepgate, is described gradually so that one may follow the characters as they will through the city and discover its geography as if one were a tourist. This manner of unveiling is achieved quite well here, and allows for vivid imagery towards the end when the climax occurs. This depth of description, however, has not been given to all the parts in the books, which is perhaps a fault, though I feel it may depend upon your own interpretation.

In conclusion, I would argue, that it is a perfectly serviceable read which is even enjoyable. However, do not expect great literature, for you shall not find it here. At times the book seems confused and the faults listed above come in to play at various junctures. It is enjoyable, however, and a suitably dark read for a cold winter’s evening, even if we are still only in autumn. I would certainly recommend it, I only hope Alan Campbell learns from Scar Night and the Codex and produces more treats on which we can feast. I cannot help feeling that Campbell is an English Trudi Canavan, but perhaps that is just me. 

I am now moving on to Iron Angel, I shall probably post a review on that when I am done.